There's no drop-down for selecting a plot type. But unless you're a crazy person who only writes Matlab code in Notepad, and only uses the IDE to execute it, there is a huge gap in Octave which is immediately obvious: There's no GUI. Oh, there's converters to make Octave code Matlab compatible, but they're not effortless to use. Don't be fooled- if you use both side by side, keep them completely separate from each other. m by default, and pretends to play nice with Matlab. This is even more annoying because Octave uses. I guess with Octave's conventions, your life as the coder is 0.0001% easier (Matlab is already very good at coming up with 'nice shortcuts'), so what's not to like? Well, thanks to this, there's a good chance Matlab will NOT run Octave code as is (basic things like the load function are altered). I don't see why anyone would care one way or the other. The differences are minor, and in my opinion extremely trivial. The reverse is not necessarily true - Octave tries to 'improve' on Matlab syntax and libraries. So you won't need to adjust to syntax, or most of the libraries - they're all almost exactly the same. Octave syntax is very similar to Matlab, it would probably literally run Matlab files with no modification. You have it with Gimp and Photoshop, Desktop Linuxes and Windows, MS Office and OpenOffice derivatives, and so on.

Unfortunately it tends to be the case with many OSS projects that they forever drag behind as a cheap knock-off of some established, already working commercial product.

Gnu octave download windows 7